I thought this would be something worth sharing, because it seems like a similar mindset that many realtors have in common (at least, the ones I have talked to).
The idea is pretty simple: The more expensive the website, the better it is.
What surprises many people is that more often than not, cheap and simple websites do better than flashy expensive ones. To help prove the points I am going to make with this, click the two links below to see how the sites differ from one another:
A More Inexpensive and Simple Website Example (customized price: ~$300)*
A Flashy and Extravagant Website Example (customized price: $2,800)
*: This is not an actual price. It is just a price I would assume would be appropriate for the caliber of the site.
Alright, without a doubt the Flashy Extravagant example looks better. It’s clean; it’s exciting; and it will probably captivate the user. But let’s break them down into different categories to see how the measure up to one another:
1. Loading Time
I remember of reports done a couple of years ago stating that you have about 4 seconds to grab a user’s attention. It is probably even less now. So, let’s say for simplicity’s sake that you now only have 3 seconds on average to get your visitors to stay on your site. Now with the simple website, it may take a second or two to load all the text and graphics. The extravagant website though has that ‘Loading’ screen, which (depending on the end user’s internet connection) could go well beyond that 3 second time frame. So with the flashy site, your visitors might even leave before ever seeing your site.
2. Search Engine Friendliness (i.e. SEO, or Search Engine Optimization)
There is no doubt that as the internet evolves, so do search engine spiders. One thing is for sure though, spiders always love plain and simple text. When it comes to flashy sites, spiders may have troubles reading them because of all the additional code needed for the animations. In the end with all things equal, chances are the simple website will have a higher ranking in the search engines than a flashy one.
**Preemptive comment: I am taking this from an onsite-optimization factor only. I understand that offsite optimization can have completely opposite effects, so no need to comment on that.
3. End User Ease-of-Use
Because most people have been raised on the idea that anything in blue is a link and anything in purple is a link you clicked on, it really gives the simple site a navigational advantage. Even though more and more people are using CSS Style Sheets (i.e. website formatting) to change this idea, sites that are flashy with cool animations may confuse the end user as to what the can and can not click on. And if users can not figure out what they can do or where they can go on your website, they will get frustrated and leave in the blink of an eye.
4. Compatibility
When it comes to the simple website, the only thing you really need to view the entire site is JavaScript (which is available on all browsers nowadays). The flashy site, on the other hand, requires a flash player, which is not standard on a lot of browsers. As silly as it may sound, people may be scared of downloading new things just to view your site, and the last thing you want your site to do is intimidate your audience.
So there are just a couple of factors to consider when looking at what you want in your own site. Hopefully, this will help you from a business standpoint and with any luck, financially as well.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.